Spinifex is an opinion column. If you would like to contribute, contact us to ask for a detailed brief.
Australia’s transition to net zero is commonly discussed in terms of renewable energy supply — solar farms, wind turbines, hydro systems, and batteries. While these are essential, one of the most effective and immediate solutions lies in the demand side of energy use: reducing the amount of fossil-fuel-based energy consumed in homes and buildings.
If Australia is serious about reducing emissions and lowering the cost of living, demand-side energy reduction must become a national priority. The technology already exists, the savings are immediate, and the environmental benefits are equivalent to planting hundreds of millions of trees every year.
Demand reduction is the quiet achiever of climate action. It requires far less capital investment than building new power stations, yet it delivers immediate financial and environmental benefits.
The transition to a sustainable future is not only about producing cleaner energy — it is equally about using energy more wisely.
Reducing demand also improves grid stability. Lower peak electricity demand reduces strain on the network during extreme summer and winter conditions and decreases reliance on fossil-fuel peaking generators, which are often the most carbon-intensive and expensive to operate.
In simple terms, the cheapest and cleanest unit of energy is the one that is never used.
For households, reducing energy demand means lower electricity and gas bills.
Australia has about 11 million households with the average household producing around 7 tonnes of carbon emissions annually from electricity and gas consumption. If every household reduced its energy use by only 10 per cent per year, Australia would save approximately 7.7 million tonnes of carbon emissions annually.
For commercial building owners, it means reduced operating costs and improved asset performance.
For governments and utilities, it means less need to build oversized generators, substations, and transmission infrastructure to meet peak demand.
The commercial building sector offers even greater opportunity. Commercial buildings account for a significant proportion of Australia’s electricity consumption. If each commercial building reduced energy use by just 15 per cent, an estimated additional 12 million tonnes of carbon emissions could be avoided every year.
These measures may appear small individually, but when adopted collectively across millions of homes and buildings, their impact becomes transformational.
Combined, these modest reductions would save close to 20 million tonnes of carbon emissions annually.
To visualise the impact, a mature tree absorbs approximately 22 kilograms of carbon emissions each year. The combined savings from homes and commercial buildings would therefore equate to the environmental benefit of approximately: 900 million mature trees
or around 35 trees for every Australian.
Importantly, many of these savings can be achieved through no-cost or low-cost measures, as highlighted in my book Defeating Mr CO? – Energy Saving Guide to Achieving Net Zero Homes & Buildings.
No-cost energy saving measures
- Set air conditioning thermostats to in 20 degrees summer and heating to 25 degrees in winter
- Turn off appliances such as TV and desktops at the power source instead of leaving them on standby
- Use natural ventilation and daylight whenever possible
- Reduce unnecessary hot water use
- Operate dishwashers and washing machines with full loads
Low-cost energy saving measures
- Replace old lighting with LED lamps
- Install weather seals around doors and windows
- Use timers and smart plugs to control equipment operation
- Clean and maintain air-conditioning filters regularly
- Operate curtains to minimise heat loss in winter and heat gain in summer
The demand side of energy is no longer the forgotten side of the equation. It is one of the most practical, affordable, and powerful climate solutions available.