Planning, designing and constructing residential settings for older persons would benefit from a focus on wellbeing, happiness and social inclusion, rather than compliance, a recently completed report has found.

Created by the director of GLAD Studio, architect Guy Luscombe, the report is based on a 2013 study tour of retirement residential, multi-age residential and aged care projects in Europe and America undertaken with a Byera Hadley Travelling Scholarship.

One of the key findings was that traditional retirement villages and nursing homes create separation and foster “otherness”, isolating people from their surrounds and from loved ones.

“They don’t tend to be environments we want to be in,” he wrote.

Guy Luscombe

“The whole world needs to get a grip on designing for ageing,” Mr Luscombe told The Fifth Estate during a phone interview.

He said that because it was a relatively recent phenomenon for there to be large numbers of active, relatively fit older people, “it is not an issue humanity has had to face before.”

The focus to date in terms of designing retirement and aged care environments has generally been on the health aspects, but Luscombe argues for a broader approach that considers the breadth of human needs and the “qualitative aspects of getting older in space” beyond the purely physical aspects such as fall prevention and infection control.

His key recommendations for a new approach to design for the aged include a needs-based approach rather than a compliance-driven approach; encouraging multigenerational housing and location of projects in urban centres close to activities and public transport; and the incorporation of Liveable Housing Guidelines to ensure ageing is an accepted part of any design brief.

He also said that ageing needed to be regarded as “normal”, because current approaches too often treat it largely as a medical condition, and this leads to residential environments that are overtly “medicalised” and “sanitised”.

“We’ve got these buildings and outcomes [currently] – what does it say about ageing?”

Wohnfabrik Solinsieme in St Gallen, Switzerland, based on a shared equity model where people got together and created their own retirement accommodation.

He said the current design typologies, particularly in care settings, generally reflected broader perceptions that ageing meant there was something wrong with people, leading to developments that also make ageing look like a negative thing.

“The language is reflected in the building.”

While the buildings do need to offer a high level of safety, Mr Luscombe said there needed to be “more rigour in understanding what an ageing facility should be like” as currently there are two basic typologies, “the hospital model and the lifestyle hotel model”.

Things that should be informing design, he said, included questions around what people wanted to do with their time.

“You don’t want to be sequestered away from the world, you are still part of the world,” he said.

“Things [in design for ageing] are often done from an occupational therapy point of view. I wanted to look at it from an architectural point of view.”

His research looked at what kinds of communal-type aged-care options existed that was also close to other people, safe and engaging. This meant looking at what types of design aspects people related most to, and also looking at sustainable ways affordable residential options can be delivered.

Some of the ownership models he said could work well in Australia include owner-equity arrangements like co-operative housing where a level of resources such as common rooms and facilities, maintenance services and energy bills are shared, reducing individual costs compared to a single-owner dwelling.

He found an example of this approach in Switzerland, Wohnfabrik Solinsieme in St Gallen, developed by four women who repurposed an old factory into retirement accommodation under a shared equity model.

The current urban planning focus on questions of density, he said, also had a relationship with residential projects for older people, as the multi-storey setting in urban settings “suits older people perfectly” as it enables a mix of ages in the immediate vicinity and therefore builds community, and ensures ease of access to activities and social engagement.

One project he looked at during the study tour was a multi-storey retirement project located above the grandstands of a major football stadium in Basel, Switzerland. This gave residents immediate “belonging” to the activities in the community and a high level of connectedness to it.

Environmental sustainability, he said, was “crucial”, and that environmental performance was becoming more normalised in design generally.

“Hopefully it will become endemic in these [retirement and aged care] buildings.”

Some developments already have green qualities, such as reduced dwelling footprints per person and public transport links – both things that suit older people.

Putting the theory into practice in Parkes

He is currently collaborating with Architects Johannsen and Associates on the design for a residential aged care project in Parkes in western NSW for Southern Cross Care. He said the design was incorporating as much as possible of the results of his research, including a focus on community engagement and social connectivity and a materiality that is “as natural as possible”.

The building operates on a natural ventilation system, with the airconditioning only necessary when temperature and/or humidity conditions are extreme. The ventilation system also includes a CO2 sensor that can automatically open the windows and purge the building if required.

A cross section of the Southern Cross Care Parkes Residential Aged Care building showing some of the sustainability and well-being initiatives, including natural ventilation and light, and verandahs.

The bedroom walls are reverse brick veneer, timber is being used extensively including for ceilings, the floors are insulated concrete (for thermal mass) and there are 250 solar collectors on the roofs. PVC was minimised, with linoleum used instead for most areas – a project of this type would commonly have vinyl.

One of the benefits of the natural ventilation system is it reduces the level of medicalised smell that is often a feature of aged care facilities. The materials specifications themselves further reduces the odour load, as fewer chemicals are required for cleaning, and low or no-VOC products are being used for paints, sealants and adhesives.

The bedrooms are grouped around a series of courtyards, each with a distinctive and individual garden to assist with a sense of ownership and also to benefit residents with dementia. There is also a specific garden for those with dementia for exercising, a planting area so residents can grow some of their own vegetables, a walkway around the entire project with a variety of exercise stations for fitness, and a men’s shed and cafe are being included within the grounds to bring the community into the setting.

“The client embraced [sustainability], and from a qualitative point of view it offers [residents] benefits like natural light, ventilation and views outside,” Mr Luscombe said.

He said integrated solar photovoltaics like this project has will become more normal across the aged care sector, as they are residential settings where energy use is quite high and so are the corresponding bills.

Ultimately, his research showed that better residential outcomes occurred when the compliance aspects cease to define the end-product, and instead the architectural focus was on wellbeing, happiness and social inclusion.

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published.

  1. Great to see this article. Everything that is said in designing for aging is also applicable to designing for disability. Wouldn’t it be great if we had design standards that were all inclusive as the starting point rather than the exception? Everything applicable to good design for the disabled, the elderly, and families with children that make them safer, more functional, healthier and more liveable, do not hinder those who are not yet old, disabled, ill, injured or have children. Can anyone tell me why design standards and conventions go out of their way to be less safe, less functional and less liveable, a prime example being making the toilet door the most narrow doorway in the house?

    1. Lynn, I agree with you, it is all about inclusiveness and not separation. The elderly and disabled do have special needs but most of all they still want to be part of life. We need to adopt a more performance based approach that is based on the whole range of human needs rather than a purely regulatory approach that focuses on a minimum standards. We need the regulations but they are often applied as a afterthought to meet compliance and the drivers of these regs are not considered at the outset. Initiatives such as the Liveable Housing Guidelines are great and do prescribe door widths etc and while they are gaining traction within the housing sector they are optional. It seems obvious that to have a more robust society we need to include all members and it is much easier to make buildings inclusive at the design and planning phase than afterwards.

  2. It is with great pleasure that I read this article on the improved design, care and consideration of homes for the older generation in our community.
    Parkes is certainly leading the way in this endeavour with the new project GRACELANDS PARKES GARDEN ESTATE commencing this year which also enhances all of the design, consideration and community concerns, desires and spirit.
    Perhaps it is the clear country air and good old country get up and go that is driving the change emanating from Parkes in the central West NSW also famous for the Dish and the annual Elvis Festival.