A Lendlease-owned portfolio of offices in Australia worth over $11.1 billion has been certified carbon neutral ahead of schedule, the property and construction giant revealed this week.  

The carbon neutral status applied to over 566,000 square metres of floor space managed by three of the company’s key office funds — the Australian Prime Property Fund (APPF) Commercial and two International Towers trusts that include the precinct at Barangaroo South.

The properties represent 15 of the 16 office assets owned by Lendlease, with the 16th not managed by the company.

According to Lendlease, the offices at Barangaroo South were already fully powered by renewable energy, and APPF Commercial was on track to achieve the same by 2025.

Lendlease Funds Management, managing director, Scott Mosely said that investing in climate-friendly buildings was increasingly crucial for real estate operators to remain competitive. 

“Tenants want to be in highly sustainable precincts that support their own environmental goals,” he said.

“Being carbon neutral in real estate will be critical in continuing to attract both capital  partners and quality tenants.”

The independent Green Building Council of Australia’s (GBCA) Green Star Performance rating was used to achieve carbon certification by Climate Active, a new iteration of the Australian Government’s carbon neutral certification.

GBCA chief executive Davina Rooney, said while there were many “high-performance” buildings in Australia, very few were certified carbon neutral.

“Buildings and construction are responsible for 39 per cent of global energy-related carbon  emissions,” Ms Rooney said. 

“Lendlease’s achievements demonstrate world leadership and that carbon neutrality within the build environment is not only the right thing to do environmentally, economically and socially, but that it’s also possible.”

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published.

  1. ‘Carbon Neutral’ is a deceptive way to describe references to any building, never mind a major commercial precinct. Proper accountability & meaning should consider whole & not selective environmental impacts. Holistically, embodied carbon footprints should be counted. With references to “Nett”, caution & common sense are the ‘outriders’ towards transparency. The UN’s IPCC ‘Nett Zero’ definition, makes its own term, something of a schoolboy error. Less need & less greed, will hopefully sustain all our lives & ambitions.

    1. Good to hear from you again, Ecojag… hopefully we get more of your non compromising insights…certainly we need them with so little time left now to make serious commitments. And we absolutely need to hear more on the net zero issue and what it should mean, Feel free to keep up the pressure. We all urgently need it. More info on the IPCC error would be good too.

      1. UN’s IPCC defines ‘Nett Zero’ as “being achieved by cutting emissions to as close to zero as possible over a specific period & compensating for any remaining emissions with projects that remove emissions from atmosphere”. Sadly, UN, IPCC, OPCW & such like politically constructed entities, become corrupted & untrustworthy. UN used 32 families of ‘tuned’ computer models for IPCC’s (AR5) Report. 1 model (Russian) worked. Time to move from post-truth world, to pro-truth world.