There are big socio-economic implications for of the COVID-19 lockdown and ultimately for urbanism and climate change.

It is only every so often that events such as Hitler’s invasion of Poland, the attack of 9/11, or the collapse of Lehman Brothers lance the festering boil of public-versus-private ideology and present all the world’s nations with stark choices. Do we jump to the left, or step to the right?

In either case, the Covid-19 pandemic of 2020 has become just such a watershed moment for all of us when US President Donald Trump called a press conference on the 26th of February to downplay the impact of the then still “novel” coronavirus saying the United States was the “number one most prepared country in the world” to deal with the impending pandemic. Wall Street, knowing better, smelt a rat. The Dow lost over 1100 points and so began a week by week decline into what we all now know will likely to greatly eclipse the Global Financial Crisis of 2008-2009.

With months of social isolation ahead we are nowhere near turning the corner.

That the United States lost six crucial weeks in combatting the virus is another major indictment on Trump’s proven anti-science leadership, having already kneecapped a department in the White House that had steered Obama’s administration through the Ebola crisis.

But of course the US is not alone. In the UK Boris Johnson reversed an initial “herd immunity”  approach. The mishandling of cruise ship Ruby Princess’s arrival in Sydney ­– amounting to 10 per cent of Australia’s cases of the disease ­– is equally disastrous, yet it is a mere hiccup in comparison to the preventable calamity that Trump’s administration has on its hands.

Indeed Australia’s prognosis seems far less damned due to its relatively swift response to the pandemic, both in terms of health care and its emergency $17.6 billion fiscal stimulus through new and improved social and business grants.

With around $16 trillion of private equity lost worldwide in less than a month, governments have scrambled to inject cash into their economies, but unlike the Wall Street bailouts of 2009, this time with millions becoming unemployed overnight, it’s for the person on the street.

Suddenly everyone is a socialist

The United States has passed the CARES Act which will pump $2 trillion into taxpayers pockets through one-off payments of a mere $1200 – unlike the indefinitely ongoing grants as in the case of Australia and New Zealand – and a host of other market related tinkering in the vein of trickle down economics, the results of which are questionable at best and firmly debunked here.

Of these unprecedented fiscal interventions, sociologist Keith Khan-Harris poses,

“A successful response from a right-wing government to the coronavirus would raise the question, if you can act that way against coronavirus, why can’t you act that way all the time?”

This has a profound implication for the other most pressing existential challenge now relegated to the back-burner: climate change.

In addition to fiscal measures, since early March, war-like states of emergency for Covid-19 have precipitated 2-3 week total lockdowns for over one third of the world’s population, with the most stringent now occurring in South Africa, India, the United Kingdom, Spain, Portugal, Germany and Australia where police and military are patrolling, issuing spot fines and in more than one case, arresting defiant surfers.

On the 30th of March 2020 Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced a flattening of the curve is now apparent for Australia, which means that Australians can exhale for the time being, while still observing an arcane set of social distancing rules that, like the shambolic federal bush-fire response, is a function of Australia’s perennial commonwealth-versus-states power dynamic.

Conversely, some observers have cheered that some individual states decided to ignore the prime minister’s recommendations in favour of their own more stringent lockdown terms.

Welcome back big brother

It seems like a lifetime ago that many of us had taken to the streets alongside striking school children to urge our governments into action on climate change. Isn’t it remarkable that we are now confined to our rooms to do a bit of digital striking, and brushing up on our cooking and thrifty homekeeping skills, which may indeed be essential for much longer than the lockdown.

In addition to mandatory social distancing decrees, some governments around the world have taken to mobile phone based surveillance measures to keep tabs on people’s movements during the crisis under the guise of ‘its for your own good’. Finally the idea of a common good has arrived with bells on. Unfortunately they are alarm bells.

“We are all in this together” has become an hourly refrain on television as leaders around the world unveil escalating crisis response measures that curtail civil liberty in the interest of the group. Where was this level of “care” during the simpler times of Greta Thunberg’s transatlantic crusade to the United Nations in New York City or the marches on the Australian government’s handling of the bushfires?

What is it about this little microbe that is seen as more of an existential threat than climate change; the statistics, damage, implications and costs of remedy of which are far greater?

The answer is short-term political gains for those in power, and what a tragic irony it is for the rash of neoliberal governments in the west to have to dust off the big government how-to manuals.

Of course Covid-19 is an indiscriminate, stealthy, and swift killer that we have not yet got our heads around and the lockdown responses are entirely necessary, however as some environmentalists note, in just three months, this microscopic virus has done more for the rapid reduction of greenhouse gas emissions than three decades of much thwarted climate change activism and carbon footprint calorie counting.

As many are arguing, the worldwide “work-from-home” response to covid-19 has cut emissions in the order of 25 per cent and presents an opportunity to rethink what face-to-face work is “essential” and what is not, and restructure accordingly.

The impact of lockdown on transportation alone is telling, and if economies can survive in the new mode, planners will need to seriously reconsider the CBD-centric mode of corporate operation when considering climate change.

Even if they don’t, corporations will soon make determinations on not only what real estate is essential, but also which of their staff are too. Like the bankers who had to reinvent themselves as baristas, brewers and sharing economy gurus post-GFC, Covid-19 is going to create new modes of survival out of necessity and revised values.

Tourism and hospitality, the hardest hit sector will bounce back as it requires a relatively small outlay if infrastructure is already in place, however chickens and veggies in the garden, home-made clothes and less international holidays will remain the new normal for millions for long after the travel restrictions are lifted.

It’s tempting to imagine that hard-hit cities like New York where people are fleeing will see rents tumble and eventually see an influx of “normal” people again, at much lower price-points, encouraging the kind of arty city New York used to be.

The same applies for many of the world’s larger cities.

The jury is out

On 20 March Foreign Policy asked 12 leading global thinkers for their predictions about how the world will look post-covid-19. The responses were wide ranging including: “a dramatic new stage in global capitalism”, “democracies will come out of their shell”, “a world less open, democratic and free”, “more China-centric globalization” and “more failed states”.

Of course, it’s very early days, but no matter how you look at it, the western-centric globalist jamboree is over, and this could present a major challenge to international cooperation on climate change.

Indeed, the socio-economic contagion of the pandemic, in a way born-of and exacerbated by globalisation, is yet to play out, but it’s clear to most that the dampner is closing fast on globalism and the kind of political cooperation towards tackling climate change even more so. Cop 26 has been postponed, and who knows which countries will be in a position to make meaningful commitments by the new date of October 2021?

Going further, as Keith Khan-Harris suspects, the coronvirus pandemic presents an existential threat to right leaning governments but they may well spin the crisis to their own ends.

A return to science, and social-science

One thing that is certain, however, is that compared with the rejection of expert advice that was so prevalent in the shock elections of Donald Trump and Brexit, there is now a reversal where the expertise, especially scientific, economic and medical, is being consulted.

As Ian Jacobs, president and vice-chancellor of UNSW Sydney, and Matthew England, Scientia professor of the UNSW Climate Change Research Centre stated:

The pandemic has united policymakers and the global scientific sector in a way not seen before. It proves that the same can be done for climate change. UNSW surveys of community attitudes across Australia conducted before Covid-19 showed that people saw climate change as the biggest ongoing issue facing the world. And most agree that a global alliance of universities can help overcome policy gridlock and better unite decision-makers.

For spatial professionals, the climate emergency and the impending economic restructuring post-Covid-19 present the biggest opportunity for spatial theory since the advent of CIAM after the first world war, an important impetus of which was the public health concerns that arose from overcrowding cities during the industrial revolution.

Modernism’s functional zoning and eradication of vital streets in favour of separated modes of transport and land-use was widely rejected in the 1970s and 1980s yet it remains the staple for so-called planning as long as it is peppered with a bit of mixed-use here and there.

This model, with its reliance on consumerist notions of “progress”, entwined as it is with the banal “work to pay off the mortgage and then retire somewhere else” Faustian deal, is going to be severely challenged post-Covid-10. A new wave of entrepreneurship and locally attuned small business is inevitable.

Implicit in the de-globalisation and restructuring that is most likely post Covid-19, is a return to more localised means of food production, more localised industrial production, remote schooling, new ruralism and the decline of “just in time” delivery models.

The 20th Century economic quick-fix of digging things out of the ground, transporting them to the other end of the earth, burning them and bashing them into shape and then shipping them back again needs to be relegated to the trash heap, not recycled!

The relevance and urgency for green new deals, in every possible country, is crystal clear when we consider countries like Indonesia, India and the United States are woefully unprepared for the pandemic in terms of health care, and just how in a post-Covid-19 world of rebuilding devastated communities, many of the same concerns overlap with a more eco-social approach to stemming climate change.

The location of the fictional town in the tv series Schitts Creek which has showcased the virtues of rural living. Goodwood Ontario, Source: MAPS edited by Author.

The time is now

As professionals, academics and laypersons alike, we want to feel that our choices are the right choices, and that we have agency, yet often life deals us a bag of lemons, not a smorgasbord. Covid-19 is the largest sack of lemons since the Black Death. It is at these critical moments that we need to be draw on the lessons of history and our innate creativity to imagine and build a better world.

The apparent paradox of closing borders yet returning to science and inevitably Keynesian economics is liberating for both left and right. In a sense we are all being sent back to school to rewrite the essay on our future. We should celebrate the opportunity this malicious microbe has brought.

As one of the world’s most cited polymaths Noam Chomsky said recently,

We are now in a situation of real social isolation. It has to be overcome by recreating social bonds in whatever way can be done, whatever kind that can be helping people in need. Contacting them, developing organisations, expanding analysation. Like before getting them to be functional and operative, making plans for the future, bringing people together as we can in the internet age, to join, consult, deliberate to figure out answers to the problems that they face and work on them, which can be done.

While we mourn our dead and pity the grandparents who can’t be with their grandchildren at this extraordinary time, and while we lick our professional wounds and say goodbye to commissions on hold or that may have vanished forever, now is the time to cheer the return of science, and not cower under the watch of the neoliberal demagogues who have yet to understand that we owe our lives and livelihoods to nature and not vice-versa.

Let’s make this the microbe that saved the world.

Fulbright Scholar Don Albert is the design principal of Sound Space Design Architects and Urban Designers and the founder of Climate Change Cities.

Spinifex is an opinion column open to all our readers to contribute to. We require 700+ words on issues related to sustainability especially in the built environment and in business. For a more detailed brief please send an email to

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published.

  1. Thanks Alex, yes agreed -it’s not time to “fix” but rather to move on and do what we know planet needs, not simply what we desire.

  2. The perils of solutions based on the current economic model of infinite growth on a finite planet have been exposed by the present situation, regardless of which supposed pole of the current political paradigm they emanate from. “Fixing” the standing paradigm will only delay the inevitable, and ensure that the next crisis hits harder than the present one, much in the way that the financial bailouts of 2008 merely postponed the fallout of the crisis, the after effects of which are being felt as part of the current crisis. A reconsideration of our vision of the future world must come now, in this slight moment of pause, before the grindstone of the economic wheels begins its relentless turn again.

  3. “Astute and on point . Thank you Don. This article speaks to my desire to become more self sufficient and embrace the microcosm that exists and supports us within our own regional village. Staying home the grass seems greener and my trust in more a collaborative community grows.” Thanks Kelli – of course the idea is that communities at all scales should become more resilient, not just small towns, but the Schitts Creek phenomenon is one of values and seeking the good in situations that might not have been one’s first choice.

  4. Astute and on point . Thank you Don. This article speaks to my desire to become more self sufficient and embrace the microcosm that exists and supports us within our own regional village. Staying home the grass seems greener and my trust in more a collaborative community grows.

  5. “…The pandemic has united policymakers and the global scientific sector in a way not seen before. It proves that the same can be done for climate change……But after the tumult and the shouting dies will the captains (of industry) and the Kings depart? We have a whole generate of economist bought up on a diet of economic growth, they are hardly likely to eat humble pie now.” Agreed, Don, it is going to require a mind shift as well as popular pressure. Economic growth at the expense of the environment’s time is over and that’s what the new green deal thinking is all about. The economists’ former policies have created the fragility in the system and this is what needs to be addressed from a social, ecological and economic perspective.

  6. …The pandemic has united policymakers and the global scientific sector in a way not seen before. It proves that the same can be done for climate change……But after the tumult and the shouting dies will the captains (of industry) and the Kings depart? We have a whole generate of economist bought up on a diet of economic growth, they are hardly likely to eat humble pie now.